Work With Us - Legalify Attorneys

Sponsorship Agreement›
Typical Transaction Structure
A fixed-term licence agreement granting defined marketing and association rights in exchange for a sponsorship fee, often with performance-linked bonus tiers (league position, competition qualification) built in.
Key Clauses
Category exclusivity, minimum guaranteed exposure (branding placement, media mentions), morality and conduct clauses governing both the sponsor’s and the sponsored party’s public conduct, and clear provisions for relegation, competition suspension, or a sponsored athlete’s disciplinary sanction.
Legal Issues
How broadly a morality clause is drafted determines whether it can actually be invoked later — vague conduct standards are difficult to enforce, while overly broad ones can expose the sponsor to claims of bad-faith termination.
Risks
Ambiguity over what counts as a breach of a morality clause is the single most common source of sponsorship litigation; the clause needs to specify concrete triggers, not just general ‘bring into disrepute’ language.
Athlete Endorsement Deal›
Typical Transaction Structure
A personal services and licensing agreement between the athlete (often through a personal services company) and the brand, covering appearance obligations, content creation, and image and likeness use.
Key Clauses
Exclusivity scope (which product categories are restricted), image rights licence terms, appearance and promotional obligations, and a clearly defined morality clause specifying what conduct triggers suspension or termination of payment.
Legal Issues
Whether the endorsement conflicts with existing club-controlled image rights or kit-sponsor exclusivity obligations already in the athlete’s playing contract — a frequent, avoidable source of dispute if not checked before signing.
Risks
An athlete’s off-field conduct becoming public is the most common trigger for endorsement disputes; how the morality clause is drafted, and what evidentiary standard applies before payment can be suspended, determines how that plays out.
Broadcasting Rights Licence›
Typical Transaction Structure
A licence granting a broadcaster rights to a defined package (live matches, highlights, archive, or data) within a specific territory and term, either sold centrally by a league or individually by a club depending on the competition’s own rules.
Key Clauses
Territorial exclusivity, sub-licensing rights (particularly relevant for streaming platforms), minimum production and coverage standards, and clear allocation of rights across live, highlights, and archive content, since these are often licensed separately.
Legal Issues
Centralised versus individual sale of rights can raise competition-law questions in some jurisdictions, and unclear allocation between live and archive/highlights rights is a common point of later dispute.
Risks
Territorial exclusivity is only as strong as the enforcement mechanism behind it — unauthorised streaming and geo-blocking circumvention are persistent practical risks that the contract’s remedies provisions need to address directly.
Facility Management Agreement›
Typical Transaction Structure
An agreement governing the operation, maintenance, and commercial exploitation of a stadium or training facility, often separate from the underlying property ownership or lease.
Key Clauses
Naming rights allocation, revenue-sharing for non-match-day events, maintenance and minimum-standard obligations tied to club-licensing stadium criteria, and clear liability and insurance allocation for third-party events held at the facility.
Legal Issues
Whether the facility continues to meet the competition organiser’s minimum licensing standards throughout the agreement’s term, and who bears responsibility if it doesn’t.
Risks
A facility falling below licensing standards can jeopardise a club’s competition eligibility entirely — a risk that belongs squarely in the facility agreement’s maintenance obligations, not left as an assumption.
Sports-Tech Partnership›
Typical Transaction Structure
A licensing or partnership agreement giving a technology provider access to a club’s data, facilities, or athletes (for wearables, performance analytics, or fan engagement platforms) in exchange for a fee, equity, or in-kind technology provision.
Key Clauses
Data ownership and usage rights (particularly for athlete biometric and performance data), exclusivity, and clear limits on how collected data may be used beyond the immediate partnership — including whether it can be sold or sublicensed to third parties.
Legal Issues
Athlete biometric data raises data-protection questions distinct from ordinary commercial data, and consent, ownership, and portability of that data need to be addressed explicitly rather than left to a generic data clause.
Risks
Ambiguous data-ownership terms are the most common point of later dispute in sports-tech partnerships, particularly once a club or athlete wants to switch providers and the question of who actually owns the historical data becomes live.
Sports Law Arbitration Academy
A structured, ten-module curriculum in sports law and arbitration — the full outline is public, and the actual teaching content is reserved for enrolled participants.
View the Academy →

Ready to talk about a transaction, a partnership, or enrolling in the Academy?

Contact Legalify Attorneys →
Before You Go

Nigerian law changes fast. Most people find out too late.

Get a short, no-fluff note only when something actually changes that affects you or your business.


    You’re on the list.

    Watch your inbox — we’ll only write when something actually changes that matters to you.